Skip to main content

Bluefin Aurora

·5 mins· loading · loading · ·
UBlue Distro Bluefin Fedora Atomic Aurora Linux
DarkXero
Author
DarkXero
I create content about Linux & FOSS software. You’ll find me rocking ArchLinux with KDE Plasma, probably helping somebody with a question. 😎
Table of Contents

What is uBlue Atomic?

uBlue is a project which produces images based on Fedora Atomic distros. You can use one of the presupplied images like Bazzite (gaming-focused image), Bluefin (general use zero-manitenance image), Aurora or their base images with minimal customizations to vanilla kinoite/silverblue/etc.

What is Aurora?

Before explaining it, I would like to answer the “Why Aurora ?” question, well in case you did not know it yet, I am a KDE Plasma shill, so why not Aurora ? LoL. Now on to what it is…

Aurora is Bluefin but with another coat of paint, the KDE Desktop. Many people love and cherish GNOME, but others want the customizability or the looks of a vanilla KDE experience. For those people, Aurora is here to serve them that need!

ublue-os/bluefin

The next generation Linux workstation, designed for reliability, performance, and sustainability.

Shell
935
142

It includes everything that makes Bluefin and Bluefin-DX so awesome, including brew on host, the bluefin-cli, the starship CLI experience, Tailscale and the container-native Ptyxis terminal. You’ll find that most of the things you’re used to in Bluefin are the same under the hood, including the just commands. Aurora is not designed to be a drastically different experience than Bluefin, which also means we (I) can keep it regularly in sync with upstream so you get the latest changes.

It is built on the kinoite-main Images. The images feature almost no customization, aside from some quality of life features and some branding. You can expect a vanilla KDE experience with developer batteries under the hood.

The upsides / benefits

  • An Awesome Package Manager

I will begin by saying this, it’s a neat project, I love how they use their sorta package manager called ujust that reminds me a heck of a lot of Topgrade which handles everything.

Topgrade AiO Updater
·3 mins· loading · loading
Update All-in-One TUI Terminal Tools Linux
  • Pre-Bundled Scripts

Not just that, but they also supply so many pre-configured scripts that make harder tasks on other distros so damn simple, it’s not even funny. They even supply an image with the nVidia or AMD drivers baked it and pre-configured for you so you don’t have to lift a finger.

ujust

  • Stability and Immunability

Also, the fact that it’s so stable with truly almost zero-maintenance needed by you the user is a Huge benefit. Especially that it uses rpm-ostree. And that it’s immune to any mistakes you might make, is so awesome. If you break the system just reboot select an older snapshot and you are back up and running. However one can still break it, but you really have to try lol.

They even supply an image for us devs out there with all the tools we might need to be productive out the box. I mean wow, could there be any more handholding ?

The Downsides (No Dealbreakers)

  • Too Much Cruft ?

Which brings me to the only Big downside, which is in my humble opinion, that it has way too much out the box, even the simple version. I get it, it aims to be as out of one’s way as possible letting us be more productive, while I agree with this, it tends to target a smaller audience. Coz not everyone wants or needs everything it provides. I mean we don’t even get to choose what we want out the box, ending up having to remove the cruft we do not need. Maybe that’s more of a Fedora limitation I do not know.

  • Laziness / No Self-Reliance

Now this is much less of an issue, more of an obervation, but if I have learned something during my Distro Maintaining days, it’s that doing too much for the user out the box, will make them both lazy and will end up too dependent on us devs/maintainers. While I can’t speak for the team behind uBlue, it’s just impossible to satisfy everyone.

  • No Freedom To Tinker

The other downside to this whole idea of Atomic distros, is that, if you were a tinkerer like me, who loves to mess with the system, modify core functionalities, you simply can’t. As such you will be heavily relying on Flatpaks. It’s not a big deal though, since this project wasn’t meant to be used that way, so am not gonna be docking it any points for that.

Would I recommend it ?

In conclusion, I will say, this is my opinion, and that you should take it with a huge grain of salt. I am a tinkerer, a not so ordinary user so to speak. And I have only been using it a day as of the writing of this post.

But yes, of ourse I would Highly recommend you at least give it a try. Just make sure to select the version that works best for you. Be it AMD, nVidia, or the Dev/DX version.

Just make sure you know that you will not be able to tinker much with it, the way you would be able to with the likes of Arch or the likes.

As for me, nope it will not replace my daily driver, ArchLinux, nothing will, I prefer my freedom for tinkering with the system. I was just curious as to what the deal was with all the Atomic distros out there is all.

That’s it folks ..

Cheers !

Related

BlueBuild Workshop
·5 mins· loading · loading
UBlue Distro Bluefin Fedora Atomic Builder Linux
Ollama A.I
·2 mins· loading · loading
AI Ollama Assistant Linux
Pacman R7.0 Update
·4 mins· loading · loading
Pacman AUR Arch Guide Linux